The Safety Guards for Machines Were Missing, but Production Resumed: A Preventable Incident in Detroit Facility

In facilities where safety guards for machines are part of daily operations, routine can sometimes feel deceptively safe.

This is a true story. Certain names and details were altered to preserve anonymity.

It was a busy morning at a manufacturing plant in Detroit. The line was moving, the usual hum of production filled the air, and maintenance tasks were underway before the next shift change.

James, a 34-year-old assembly worker known for his reliability, was completing a routine check on a conveyor belt he’d serviced many times before. Nothing about the task felt unusual. He reached in to make a quick adjustment, something he’d done countless times without issue.

His glove caught on the moving belt, pulling his hand into the machinery.

Within a second, everything changed. His glove caught on the moving belt, pulling his hand into the machinery. Nearby coworkers immediately hit the emergency stop and rushed to help, but the damage was already done.

What Investigators Found

During the review, it became clear that the injury occurred because safety guards for machines had been removed during maintenance and were never reinstalled before production resumed. Further examination showed that the procedure for reinstalling guards wasn’t consistently enforced, and no secondary verification step existed to confirm that equipment had been returned to a safe, operable state.

Investigators also learned that James had never received equipment-specific training on the hazards tied to maintaining that conveyor, despite being expected to perform maintenance tasks. The gaps weren’t malicious. They were the kind that develop quietly over time, until a moment like this forced everyone to confront them.

Lessons Learned

What happened to James is a reminder that most serious injuries don’t come from extraordinary circumstances, they come from routine work where steps are skipped, hazards are underestimated, or systems aren’t followed as tightly as they should be.

Key takeaways for safety leaders:

  • Safety guards for machines must never be optional. If a machine guard is removed for maintenance, a process must ensure it is reinstalled and verified before the equipment is returned to service.
  • Task-specific training matters. General safety training isn’t enough. Workers need to understand the risks tied to the exact equipment they maintain.
  • Audits catch what routine hides. Regular inspections can reveal missing guards, inconsistent maintenance practices, and drift in procedure.
  • Emergency response saves lives. The quick actions of James’s coworkers ensured he received immediate care — reinforcing the value of on-site responders trained to act fast.

While James is recovering, his injury permanently changed his life both at work and at home. Through the multiple fractures and deep lacerations he sustained, tasks as simple as tying his shoe or holding his fork became long, painful challenges. His story reflects the human cost behind every safety lapse, no matter how small it may seem at the time.

Break Routine: The Next Step for Safety Leaders

We share these stories not to alarm, but to emphasize what’s real. Incidents like this happen in seconds and they’re preventable.

When was the last time your team verified that safety guards for machines were reinstalled and documented after maintenance? Are your workers trained on equipment-specific hazards? Are your audits catching what routine tends to overlook?

If the answer is “I’m not sure,” that’s the moment to step in before something goes wrong.

If the answer is “I’m not sure,” that’s the moment to step in before something goes wrong. Our EHS consultants can help answer your questions, review your machine-guarding program, evaluate task-specific training, and support a safety culture that protects your people long before an emergency ever begins.

For safety support or help improving your program, contact Cardinal Compliance Consultants today.



from Cardinal Compliance Consultants https://cardinalhs.net/blog/safety-guards-for-machines-missing/
via Cardinal Compliance Consultants

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The 5 Types of Workplace Hazards: What Every Safety-Conscious Employer Needs to Know

Image
Every 7 seconds, a worker is injured on the job. For safety directors like Keith—who’s seen everything from chemical burns to crushed limbs—these aren’t just statistics; they’re nightmares that keep him up at 3 AM. The consequences of workplace hazards extend far beyond OSHA citations and fines. They affect your employees’ well-being, your productivity, your reputation, and ultimately, your bottom line. At Cardinal Compliance Consultants , we’ve spent over a decade helping businesses identify, evaluate, and control workplace hazards worldwide. With decades of experience our team of experts has seen firsthand how unaddressed hazards can derail operations and change lives forever. Understanding the five major categories of workplace hazards is the crucial first step toward creating a comprehensive safety program that truly protects your workforce. Whether you’re in construction, manufacturing, healthcare, or any industry where OSHA compliance matters (which is virtually all of them)...
Read more

Worker Burned After Tank Explodes — Company learns why machine-specific LOTO procedures are needed

** This is a true story. Names and certain details were changed to preserve anonymity. A busy R&D company was working on a sustainability project involving alternative fueling options for a piece of equipment at their facility. The project was long awaited, had underwent much research and was finally at the testing stage which involved a new fuel source being pumped into a propane tank that was already onsite. The project manager, Steve, and maintenance man, Rob, were in charge of oversight on the fueling of the propane tank. When the Job Began With no machine-specific procedure established, Steve began by locking out the lines of the tank based off of his knowledge and proceeded with loading the new fuel. However, as luck would have it, the truck dispensing the fuel was having issues with the pump stalling, so, after multiple attempts, Steve and the truck’s driver decided to call it quits. The driver disconnected, bled the lines, and left. Before leaving, Steve told Rob how t...
Read more

Formaldehyde Found to be Carcinogenic to Humans Via Inhalation

A final toxicological review by EPA’s Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) program finds that formaldehyde is carcinogenic to humans through the inhalation route of exposure. The report, released in August 2024, concludes that formaldehyde inhalation can cause several upper respiratory tract cancers and myeloid leukemia, and establishes a reference concentration (RfC) for formaldehyde of 7 µg/m3 (~0.006 ppm). EPA defines the RfC as “the level of continuous inhalation exposure to the human population (including sensitive subgroups) that is likely to be without appreciable risk of deleterious effects during a lifetime.” The report, released in August 2024, concludes that formaldehyde inhalation can cause several upper respiratory tract cancers and myeloid leukemia In occupational settings, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) permissible exposure limit (PEL) for formaldehyde is 0.75 parts per million (ppm) over an 8-hour workday. The short-term exposure limit...
Read more